Convergence didn’t fail, compliance did.
- Adel Osta Dadan
- Jun 17
- 2 min read
Updated: Jun 19
Convergence has been claimed. Security orgs merged their teams, aligned their titles, and drew the new boxes on the whiteboard. The result: security teams are now responsible for both cloud and on-premises network environments.

But for many of those teams, compliance is still running on fumes.
The reporting lines changed. The responsibilities increased. The oversight? Still patchy. The systems? Still fragmented. And the ability to demonstrate consistent policy enforcement across hybrid environments—where compliance lives or dies—has never been more at risk.
This isn’t an edge case. It’s structural. And it’s quietly putting every converged team in a bind.
The illusion of control
If convergence was supposed to simplify compliance, most teams missed the memo.

Cloud-native controls don’t sync with on-prem rule sets. Application deployments move faster than the audits tracking them. Policies drift. Risk assessments stall out. And when the next audit comes knocking, security teams are left reconciling evidence after the fact—manually stitching together logs, policies, and screenshots across tools that don’t talk to each other.
The result? Ownership without visibility. Policy without context. Responsibility without control.
Compliance at the application layer—or nowhere
Security and compliance are often treated as parallel tracks. But in hybrid environments, they’re the same problem.
The more distributed your network, the more fragmented your enforcement—and the harder it becomes to map controls to real business risk. What matters isn’t whether a port is open. It’s whether the application behind it should be reachable from that region, that VPC, or that user.
That requires context. And today, context lives at the application layer.
This is where AlgoSec Horizon changes the equation.
AlgoSec Horizon is the first platform built to secure application connectivity across hybrid networks—with compliance embedded by design.

Horizon: compliance that knows what it’s looking at
With Horizon, compliance isn’t an add-on. It’s the outcome of deep visibility and policy awareness at the level that actually matters: the business application.
Our customers are using Horizon to:
Automatically discover and map every business application—including shadow IT and unapproved flows
Simulate rule changes in advance, avoiding deployment errors that compromise compliance
Track and enforce policies in context, with real-time validation against compliance frameworks
Generate audit-ready reports across hybrid networks without assembling data by hand
It’s compliance without the swivel chair. And it’s already helping converged teams move faster—without giving up control.
Compliance can’t be an after-thought.
Security convergence wasn’t the mistake. Stopping at structure was.
When compliance is left behind, the risk isn’t just audit failure—it’s operational drag. Policy friction. Delays in application delivery. Missed SLAs. Because the real impact of compliance gaps isn’t found in the SOC—it’s found in the business outcomes that stall because security couldn’t keep pace.
Horizon closes that gap.
Because in a world of converged teams and hybrid environments, security has to operate with complete visibility—and compliance has to work at the speed of the application.

Great information, so I can improve my website better. Connect with me on Skribbl io to make friends with each other.
Do you think compliance – if viewed as a core part of a security strategy rather than a post-audit procedure, could change the Among Us Online way systems are designed from the start?